
Trump's Ukraine peace push stalls as Putin refuses core concessions
Diplomacy falters as battlefield pressure and calendar urgency collide
A high-profile U.S.-led push to accelerate a negotiated settlement in Ukraine has failed to secure a breakthrough after a series of short, technical sessions in Geneva and intense shuttle diplomacy timed to political milestones in Washington. Mediators reported modest operational gains — most visibly a reciprocal prisoner exchange of 314 detainees — but no agreement on the two issues Kyiv says are prerequisites for a durable pause: verified territorial pullbacks and multinational security guarantees.
President Trump’s public urgency compressed the diplomatic window toward a symbolic U.S. deadline, while some mediators privately discussed an even tighter target of June — timing that Kyiv and analysts warned was politically conditioned and operationally unrealistic. That calendar pressure amplified tensions inside allied coordination forums as capitals debated whether to push for a quick, pared-down deal or to insist on enforceable mechanisms that Kyiv deems non‑negotiable.
Diplomacy unfolded against intensified kinetic campaigning. Western and Ukrainian field reports describe a coordinated aerial assault during the Geneva sessions involving hundreds of unmanned aerial systems (roughly 396–400 by many counts) and a variable number of guided missiles (reports range from about 29 to more than 60). The strikes damaged substations, switchyards and thermal power plants across Kyiv, Dnipro and Odesa, triggering rolling outages, straining hospitals and metro systems on backup generation, and prompting Kyiv to request emergency electricity imports from Poland.
The co‑existence of urgent, U.S.-driven negotiations and renewed attacks on civilian energy infrastructure demonstrates an operational disconnect: pauses discussed in meetings were not matched by reliable monitoring or ceasefire enforcement on the ground, and Moscow has not publicly confirmed any agreed cessation. Analysts note that lulls have historically been used by Russian forces to resupply and consolidate — a pattern Kyiv and some EU intelligence assessments warned could repeat absent verifiable safeguards.
Geneva’s private sessions, led in part by U.S. private envoys, produced a 20‑point framework of broad principles and a handful of narrowly scoped deliverables: prisoner swaps, limited tactical pauses in some theatres, reactivation of incident‑notification channels and offers from donors on reconstruction and stabilization. Publicly touted pledges — including a headline $5 billion reconstruction pledge and readiness to consider stabilization forces described in the 'thousands' — remain conditional, lacking deployment schedules, national troop commitments or command arrangements.
Diplomatic signals were complicated by personnel shifts on negotiation teams: diplomats reported that Moscow replaced an intelligence chief on its delegation with a presidential aide of a harder political posture, a move some mediators read as reducing space for technical, military‑to‑military bargaining. That, together with the reliance on individual private envoys and personal networks, boosted short‑term access but weakened institutional follow‑through and independent verification capacity.
On the battlefield, commanders describe a persistent equilibrium: neither side is achieving decisive operational breakthroughs that would force meaningful concession tradeoffs. That military stalemate, coupled with the lack of enforceable monitoring mechanisms (sensors, rapid‑response multinational elements and legal arrangements), undercuts the credibility of any written ceasefire and elevates the risk that pauses become opportunities for consolidation rather than demobilisation.
For Kyiv, the political calculus remains binary: accept incremental territorial losses that could buy a brittle pause, or insist on verified pullbacks and robust guarantees that preserve sovereignty — a stance President Zelensky has framed as necessary to prevent long‑term harm to national cohesion and international norms. Kyiv has also highlighted industrial and licensing gaps that constrain its ability to produce critical munitions and air‑defence components under foreign licence, underscoring the longer-term nature of defence sustainment challenges.
Allied capitals now face a triage decision set: pursue a quick, politically visible accord that risks domestic blowback and territorial concessions for Kyiv; double down on coercive measures that extend the conflict and test alliance unity; or accept a prolonged status quo and reconfigure long‑term assistance and readiness plans. Each path carries predictable costs for coalition management, European energy security and global markets sensitive to grain and fuel flows.
In short, the compressed diplomacy advanced by the U.S. has produced limited technical progress but not the core ingredients of a durable settlement. The interplay of battlefield operations, contested casualty figures and conditional donor promises suggests negotiations will manage escalation episodically rather than resolve the sovereignty dispute, increasing the odds of a protracted stalemate and a shift toward lower‑visibility bargaining and bilateral security deals.
Read Our Expert Analysis
Create an account or login for free to unlock our expert analysis and key takeaways for this development.
By continuing, you agree to receive marketing communications and our weekly newsletter. You can opt-out at any time.
Recommended for you

Putin’s war finances tighten as peace negotiations restart
Renewed negotiations are arriving at a moment when Moscow’s military spending outpaces available revenues, forcing short-term fixes that increase medium-term risk. How the Kremlin balances battlefield demands against domestic fiscal stability will determine both the scope of operations and leverage at the negotiating table.

US aims for a June resolution as strikes cripple Ukraine’s power network
U.S. envoys have invited Kyiv and Moscow to talks on U.S. soil with a compressed timetable that aims to reach a settlement by June, Kyiv says. The diplomatic window opens as intensified Russian strikes — including a large combined drone-and-missile assault hitting Kyiv, Dnipro and Odesa — further damaged substations and thermal plants, forcing rolling outages, emergency requests for power from Poland and urgent international offers of materiel support.

Geneva Peace Talks Stall as Drone-and-Missile Barrage Underscores Deep Divide
U.S.-facilitated Geneva negotiations produced only limited, tactical outcomes — notably a 314-person prisoner swap — while Kyiv and Moscow remain deadlocked over territorial control and security guarantees. A major overnight aerial campaign (roughly 396–400 drones and an uncertain missile tally reported between 29 and 60) that damaged energy infrastructure and prompted rolling outages sharpened Kyiv’s insistence on enforceable protections.

Kaja Kallas urges US to shift pressure onto Russia to jumpstart Ukraine talks
EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas told Bloomberg the US should stop principally pressing Kyiv and instead ramp up pressure on Moscow to generate negotiating incentives; her intervention mirrors wider European impatience (including calls to fast‑track Ukraine’s EU accession) but collides with frontline warnings that Russian conciliatory rhetoric can be tactical, and with U.S.‑timed diplomacy that has so far produced limited, unverifiable gains.

Witkoff and Kushner Drive Trump’s Private Peace Initiative
A Trump-backed delegation led by Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner held concentrated talks in Geneva that produced a 20-point framework, donor pledges including $5 billion and vague promises of stabilization troops, and a negotiated pause that enabled aid and a prisoner exchange. The effort returned negotiations to Europe after Abu Dhabi, delivered limited tactical wins (including a 314-person prisoner swap), but was undercut by a large subsequent strike on Ukrainian energy infrastructure and deep skepticism about compressed timelines for a broader settlement.

Zelenskyy says Russia is stalling as Geneva talks produce little concrete progress
Two days of U.S.-facilitated Geneva talks were short and largely procedural, producing a reciprocal prisoner swap but no framework on territory or multinational security guarantees; Moscow signalled continued insistence on territorial outcomes while Kyiv demanded enforceable security measures first. The conference was overshadowed by a major aerial campaign that struck energy infrastructure, underlining the fragility of short-term operational pauses and the limits of current leverage on Moscow.
Zelenskyy: Putin Has Not Achieved War Aims as Ukraine Enters Fifth Year
President Zelenskyy marked the start of the fifth year of the war, asserting that Moscow has not met its strategic objectives while Kyiv presses for a settlement Ukrainians will accept amid active fighting and winter energy shocks. New developments — a 314-person prisoner exchange, an authoritative $588 billion reconstruction estimate, and sharply divergent casualty tallies — sharpen the politics of verification, donor leverage and the timescale for any durable deal.

U.S.-Facilitated Geneva Talks Resume as Energy Truce Collapses and Delegation Shifts Raise Doubts
A third U.S.-mediated round between Russia and Ukraine is set for Feb. 17–18 in Geneva after two Abu Dhabi sessions, but renewed strikes on power infrastructure and a change in the Russian negotiating lead make a substantive breakthrough unlikely. Tactical steps — a prisoner swap and a short halt to energy-targeted attacks — have eased immediate pressures but collapsed quickly, exposing gaps in verification and enforcement that will complicate any push for a political settlement by June.