
Kaja Kallas urges US to shift pressure onto Russia to jumpstart Ukraine talks
Kallas pushes for a Washington pivot
EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas publicly criticized the current U.S. approach to negotiations over Ukraine in a Bloomberg interview, arguing Washington’s emphasis on urging Kyiv to make concessions has not yielded substantive progress and should be redirected toward increasing pressure on Moscow.
Her intervention is consistent with a broader European restlessness: at the Munich Security Conference Kallas also framed fast‑tracking Ukraine’s EU accession as a strategic lever to restore deterrence and project European influence — an explicit example of European capitals seeking more agenda‑setting authority in diplomacy with Washington.
Kallas’s call would, in practice, entail a shift in diplomatic messaging, faster coordination on punitive tools and tightened export controls and sanctions design to close evasion channels — all aimed at creating costs for Russian non‑cooperation rather than principally asking Kyiv to move first.
But that prescription meets important caveats signalled by frontline and allied actors: Estonia’s intelligence assessment warns that Russian conciliatory rhetoric frequently masks tactical pauses used to resupply and consolidate, not genuine de‑escalation, and urges scepticism and the need for verifiable battlefield changes before changing defensive postures.
The debate also overlaps with operational realities on the ground and in allied diplomacy. Recent U.S.‑led efforts to accelerate talks in Geneva, compressed around Washington’s political calendar, produced some technical deliverables — prisoner exchanges and a principles framework — but failed to secure verified territorial pullbacks or durable guarantees, even as fighting and strikes on civilian infrastructure continued.
Meanwhile Kyiv has been intensifying direct lobbying for enlarged arms shipments to change the operational balance, a move that underlines how Ukrainian strategy simultaneously seeks leverage through military capability while European leaders push for diplomatic and political levers against Moscow.
Poland and other major European contributors have publicly demanded a defined role in any settlement talks, arguing that states underwriting Kyiv’s defense have legitimate stakes and must be consulted — a stance that reinforces Kallas’s push for greater EU involvement in shaping negotiating terms.
Taken together, these threads reflect an emergent Western fault line: European capitals are signalling impatience with U.S. tactics that they view as either politically time‑boxed or too focused on constraining Kyiv; frontline states caution against mistaking Russian pauses for progress; and Kyiv is leveraging alternative diplomatic channels to secure material advantages on the battlefield.
Practically, a successful reorientation toward pressuring Russia would require tighter multilateral enforcement — closing at least the common evasion routes in finance, re‑export hubs and dual‑use supply chains — plus verifiable monitoring mechanisms on the ground to prevent tactical exploitation of pauses.
There is also a political trade‑off: harder pressure on Moscow could raise its costs and potentially compel concessions, but it could equally harden Russia’s negotiating posture or prompt asymmetric retaliations that complicate front‑line stabilization and allied consensus.
Expect this debate to shape Western policy planning in the coming 3–12 months as capitals weigh sanctions design, integration of military assistance with diplomacy, and demands for enlarged European participation in any settlement architecture.
Read Our Expert Analysis
Create an account or login for free to unlock our expert analysis and key takeaways for this development.
By continuing, you agree to receive marketing communications and our weekly newsletter. You can opt-out at any time.
Recommended for you

Kaja Kallas urges quick Ukraine accession, rebuts U.S. narrative of EU decline
Estonia’s prime minister Kaja Kallas told the Munich Security Conference that the European Union should accelerate Ukraine’s membership bid and treat enlargement as a strategic instrument. She dismissed portrayals of the bloc’s terminal decline and said the EU can still cooperate with the United States despite differences over values.

Trump's Ukraine peace push stalls as Putin refuses core concessions
President Trump’s accelerated diplomacy failed to overcome Moscow’s refusal to concede on territorial and verification demands, leaving a stalled process that produced only limited technical steps. Geneva talks yielded a reciprocal prisoner swap and tentative confidence-building measures but were overtaken by large drone-and-missile strikes on Ukraine’s energy grid, underscoring how battlefield dynamics are undermining compressed political timetables.

Estonian intelligence warns Russia is using peace talks to advance war aims
Estonian foreign intelligence concludes Moscow’s recent conciliatory language toward negotiations is tactical and aimed at consolidating battlefield and political gains rather than signaling a genuine halt to operations. The assessment comes as a public split among senior Estonian officials over engagement strategy risks sending mixed signals to NATO partners and Moscow, complicating allied policy responses.

Poland Argues European Funders Deserve Formal Role in US‑Led Ukraine Talks
Poland’s foreign minister urged that European states contributing substantial military and financial support to Ukraine should be included more directly in peace negotiations brokered by the United States. He framed the demand around accountability and access to information for those underwriting the defense effort, warning of growing frustration among European capitals.

Zelenskiy urges Donald Trump to authorize a larger weapons transfer to hasten Russia’s exit
Ukraine’s president has made a direct appeal to Donald Trump seeking an expanded military package to change battlefield dynamics and pressure Moscow into conceding. The request recalibrates Kyiv’s diplomatic strategy, shifting focus onto influential U.S. actors and raising fresh political and escalation risks for transatlantic aid.

US aims for a June resolution as strikes cripple Ukraine’s power network
U.S. envoys have invited Kyiv and Moscow to talks on U.S. soil with a compressed timetable that aims to reach a settlement by June, Kyiv says. The diplomatic window opens as intensified Russian strikes — including a large combined drone-and-missile assault hitting Kyiv, Dnipro and Odesa — further damaged substations and thermal plants, forcing rolling outages, emergency requests for power from Poland and urgent international offers of materiel support.

Zelenskyy says Russia is stalling as Geneva talks produce little concrete progress
Two days of U.S.-facilitated Geneva talks were short and largely procedural, producing a reciprocal prisoner swap but no framework on territory or multinational security guarantees; Moscow signalled continued insistence on territorial outcomes while Kyiv demanded enforceable security measures first. The conference was overshadowed by a major aerial campaign that struck energy infrastructure, underlining the fragility of short-term operational pauses and the limits of current leverage on Moscow.

China deepens backing for Russia’s Ukraine campaign, Western agencies warn
Western intelligence judges Beijing increased material and diplomatic support for Moscow across 2025 and that coordination is likely to broaden in 2026, but Beijing’s approach remains pragmatic and calibrated. The shift — centred on approvals, third‑party routing and financial layering — constrains European leverage, complicates sanctions enforcement and heightens the need for allied chokepoint controls and intelligence sharing.