M23 Reignites Fight Over DRC Mineral Zones
Context and Chronology
An armed resurgence has unfolded across eastern provinces, centred on contested mining belts and dense local fault lines of identity and politics. Government troops and allied community militias have engaged the M23 force, which operates with logistical support coming from across the frontier. Negotiated pacts brokered by external actors did not halt clashes; combat resumed even where accords were formally signed. Concurrently, a catastrophic slope failure at small-scale coltan/tantalum workings near Rubaya — an area reported to be under M23 control — has produced a major humanitarian crisis, reinforcing how armed control of extraction zones degrades oversight and raises immediate human and commercial risks.
Operational picture on the ground
Frontline shifts are concentrated in territories that host lucrative ore deposits, where small units seize towns and mineral nodes to fund operations. Local defence groups such as Wazalendo have surged into vacuums, complicating command-and-control for Kinshasa. In Rubaya, dense, hand-excavated artisanal tunnels collapsed following heavy rains; eyewitnesses and local spokespeople report a death toll exceeding two hundred, many injured and dozens still believed buried under mud and debris. The pits’ occupation by irregular forces has limited formal oversight and hampered search-and-rescue and recovery; survivors have been evacuated to clinics and to Goma for treatment while difficult clearance operations continue.
Strategic, economic and humanitarian stakes
This conflict and the Rubaya disaster are linked by the same underlying driver: contestation over extraction corridors for strategic minerals including cobalt, coltan and tantalum. Whoever secures physical control can tax output, redirect flows, and extract rents that sustain armed groups while undermining formal exports. The Rubaya collapse turns abstract supply-chain risk into an immediate shock — shipments from the site will be disrupted, buyers face pressure to verify traceability and ethical sourcing, and downstream manufacturers and regulators will likely escalate scrutiny. Human-rights concerns (including reports of child labour and unsafe artisanal practices) amplify reputational and compliance exposures for firms sourcing these commodities.
Regional and policy implications
Cross-border dynamics have intensified diplomatic friction between Kinshasa and Kigali, elevating the episode from an internal security problem to a regional liability. External patrons and markets now face discrete choices: impose targeted measures, increase peacekeeping and mine-safety resources, or accept asymmetric resource governance that favors armed actors. The Rubaya incident illustrates that non-state control of mining zones both increases the probability of humanitarian disasters and shortens the lag between local violence and global supply disruptions. Absent credible enforcement and coordinated humanitarian and mine-safety responses, expect episodic violence, recurring mine accidents, and dislocations in strategic mineral markets.
Read Our Expert Analysis
Create an account or login for free to unlock our expert analysis and key takeaways for this development.
By continuing, you agree to receive marketing communications and our weekly newsletter. You can opt-out at any time.
Recommended for you
Landslide at Eastern DRC Coltan Pits Kills Over 200, Exposes Supply and Safety Risks
A catastrophic slope collapse at artisanal coltan workings near Rubaya has killed more than 200 people and left many trapped or injured. The disaster, occurring in territory held by the M23 armed group, exposes acute safety failures, humanitarian need, and potential short-term disruption to tantalum supply chains.
U.S. Officials Press AVZ Minerals to Transfer DRC Lithium Stake to American Buyer
Senior U.S. officials met with executives of Perth-listed AVZ Minerals to press for the sale of its interest in the Manono lithium deposit in the Democratic Republic of Congo to a U.S. company. The intervention fits a broader pattern—seen in recent U.S.-backed proposals for copper and cobalt assets—that uses public-private arrangements and non-binding memoranda to steer strategic mineral supplies toward Western buyers, raising questions about sovereignty, contract stability and investor confidence.
Pakistan’s mineral ambitions imperiled as US-origin arms arm militants
American weapons abandoned in Afghanistan have surfaced across Pakistan’s border regions, strengthening insurgents and raising security costs for planned mineral projects. U.S. financing for Reko Diq and high-value mineral claims have intensified geopolitical competition, but violence now threatens to derail resource extraction and local stability.
U.S.-backed consortium moves to buy 40% of Glencore copper and cobalt assets in the DRC
Glencore and the Orion Critical Mineral Consortium have signed a non-binding MoU that would give Orion CMC a 40% interest in Glencore’s Mutanda and Kamoto Copper Company operations in the Democratic Republic of Congo, implying a combined enterprise value near $9 billion. The deal would grant the consortium governance rights over board representation and the ability to direct the sale of its share of production under the U.S.-DRC strategic framework, while Glencore would continue operating the sites pending approvals and due diligence.
Gecamines to Market Kamoto Copper from Glencore Mine in Congo
Congo’s state miner Gecamines will take on marketing rights for a large portion of copper from Glencore’s Kamoto operation — roughly half of output at first, stepping down thereafter — while the deal sits alongside a separate MoU that would give a U.S.-backed Orion consortium an economic stake in Kamoto and Mutanda. The two moves together signal growing state and geopolitical engagement in DRC copper flows, with immediate commercial re-routing and longer-term supply-chain and policy implications.
Uganda’s army chief accuses U.S. embassy of aiding hiding opposition leader, heightening post-election crisis
A senior military commander in Uganda publicly accused officials at the U.S. diplomatic mission of assisting the nation’s main opposition figure as the latter remains in hiding after a contested presidential vote. The allegation and accompanying threats from the army have intensified domestic unrest and risk straining relations with foreign partners, with potential consequences for aid and security cooperation.
South Sudan’s Army Opens Major Jonglei Offensive, Raising Fears of Mass Violence and Humanitarian Collapse
The South Sudanese military has launched a large-scale operation in Jonglei to retake towns seized by opposition forces, ordering civilians to evacuate and aid groups to withdraw on short notice. A circulated recording of a commander urging indiscriminate violence has intensified international alarm and increased the risk of widescale abuses and displacement.
Ethiopia Demands Eritrean Forces Withdraw as Border Tensions Rise
Ethiopia has formally accused Eritrean troops of entering its northern border areas and demanded their withdrawal, linking de-escalation to talks that include potential port access. Rising violence inside Tigray and the suspension of some domestic air services add pressure, suggesting the episode could feed a wider unraveling of fragile post-conflict arrangements.