Bank of England's Alan Taylor: US Tariffs to Lift Inflationary Pressure Over Years
Tariff shock and monetary spillovers
Bank of England policymaker Alan Taylor argued that tighter U.S. trade barriers are not a short-lived disturbance but a multi-year source of price pressure that central banks should factor into decisions.
Taylor drew a historical parallel to earlier episodes of elevated protectionism to explain why pass-through from tariffs to consumer prices and producer costs can unfold slowly: inventories, contractual pricing, and gradual repricing of supply chains mean the full effect often materialises over many quarters.
Complementing Taylor's view, European Central Bank speakers and economists — including Fabio Panetta — emphasise that the incidence of those costs is uneven. Panetta highlighted that a large share of the burden appears to fall on firms and consumers in the country imposing levies, with estimates in public remarks and related studies putting consumer incidence near half of the shock and only a small fraction (he cited roughly 10%) retained abroad.
ECB modelling and trade-data analysis add a critical cross‑border wrinkle: for the euro area the net effect so far has been a contraction in external demand that, on aggregate, has produced a disinflationary impulse because lost export income and weaker activity have offset imported-cost pressures.
These apparently conflicting signals are reconciled once timing, geography and sectoral exposure are accounted for: tariffs tend to raise prices in the imposing country through immediate pass‑through and margin compression, while partner economies can see their price paths eased by lower external demand — and the largest price effects often arrive with a lag (ECB work points to a roughly 1–2 year horizon) as temporary buffers unwind.
Taylor emphasised the monetary-policy channel: tariff shocks can reshape inflation expectations, narrow central banks’ optionality and lift the neutral rate priced into bond markets, complicating forward guidance and raising the bar for easing. That channel operates even if headline CPI remains quiescent in some trading partners because market-implied real yields and term premia are quick to incorporate persistent risks to inflation.
Both Taylor and ECB commentators note a suite of private- and public-sector buffers that have muted near-term pass-through — negotiated exemptions and caps, front‑loaded imports, inventory build‑ups, rerouted sourcing and firms absorbing costs to defend market share — but they warn these cushions are temporary and can reverse as inventories run down or exemptions lapse.
A related political-legal change — a recent high-court ruling that affects executive trade authority — lowers the domestic political cost of episodic tariff escalations, increasing the chance that duties will be used repeatedly and unpredictably across political cycles, a point Taylor underlined when connecting trade levers to longer-term monetary risk.
For the United Kingdom the combined channel of imported cost pressures, second‑round wage effects and potential knock‑on impacts from weaker external demand means UK CPI is more likely to stay above target for longer, forcing the Bank of England to weigh additional tightening or delayed easing depending on how pass‑through and domestic slack evolve.
Across global supply chains, firms that rely on imported intermediate goods face higher input costs and will either compress margins, raise consumer prices, or rework sourcing — all outcomes that feed back into central banks’ inflation assessments. Sectoral heterogeneity is pronounced: machinery, autos and chemicals appear particularly exposed, while services and digital trade are much less affected.
Taylor’s intervention reframes tariffs as a monetary risk factor rather than only a trade headline: the combination of geography, timing and sectoral exposure means central banks will face different trade‑offs — inflationary pressure at home, possible disinflation abroad — and must monitor passthrough rates, labour-market dynamics and fiscal offsets together.
For investors and policymakers, the practical implication is to expect a longer planning horizon for costs, a higher premium on supply‑chain resilience and hedging, and a reasonable probability of higher real yields and term premia if tariff measures broaden or persist.
Read Our Expert Analysis
Create an account or login for free to unlock our expert analysis and key takeaways for this development.
By continuing, you agree to receive marketing communications and our weekly newsletter. You can opt-out at any time.
Recommended for you
ECB analysis finds U.S. tariffs blunt euro‑area inflation; rate cuts could undo pressure
An ECB research paper finds recent U.S. import levies have trimmed euro‑area demand and exerted downward pressure on consumer prices. The authors also note that political bargaining and firm-level responses have softened the immediate pass‑through, but those buffers are temporary — and because affected sectors are highly rate‑sensitive, ECB rate cuts could largely reverse the disinflationary impact.
Bank of England likely to keep Bank Rate steady as inflation proves sticky
The Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee is widely expected to leave the Bank Rate unchanged at 3.75% in its first meeting of the year as mixed signals — persistent inflation but signs of a cooling labour market — warrant a cautious, data-dependent pause. Markets have already trimmed the odds of near-term moves and will focus on the committee’s language and the accompanying quarterly projections for guidance on the timing of any easing.
ECB’s Panetta: Tariffs Have Hit the US Hardest
ECB Governing Council member Fabio Panetta says recent U.S. tariffs shifted most of the economic cost onto American shoulders — with foreign exporters absorbing a small share (~10%) and consumers and firms shouldering the bulk — a pattern that raises near‑term inflationary pressure in some places while depressing demand in others, complicating central-bank trade‑offs.
UK: Bank of England Pauses Rate Moves as Jobs Data Turns Softer
The Bank of England has opted to hold policy rates steady as recent labour-market indicators show cooling momentum, reducing the immediate upside risk to inflation from tight capacity. Policymakers framed the move as a conditional pause — preserving the option to tighten again if inflation re-accelerates or to ease only with clearer evidence of a sustained slowdown.
Bitcoin drifts as US tariff ruling and hotter inflation reshape market dynamics
Bitcoin traded in a narrow range after the US Supreme Court curtailed presidential tariff authority while US core inflation surprised higher, dimming near‑term Fed easing odds. Market participants flagged structural liquidity weaknesses—recent spot ETF outflows and concentrated derivatives liquidations—that could amplify moves once price breaks the $65K–$72K technical corridor and the 200‑week EMA.
Bundesbank warns US Fed's loss of independence could fuel global inflation
Bundesbank President Joachim Nagel warned that political encroachment on the U.S. Federal Reserve could set a precedent prompting other governments to press their central banks toward easier policy, raising inflationary risks worldwide. He said Europe’s monetary framework is legally robust but not immune to spillovers from a shift in U.S. central bank behaviour, and noted that recent public commentary from U.S. officials and fiscal pressures make the credibility challenge more acute.
Tariffs, Resilience and Risk: Why U.S. Growth Has So Far Weathered Heavy Import Levies
A year after steep import duties were rolled out, growth has continued instead of collapsing as many forecast; negotiated rollbacks, exemptions and adaptive behavior from firms and foreign suppliers muted the immediate hit. Yet fresh data — including a sharp November swing in the goods deficit and accelerated rerouting of supply chains — underline that the resilience is conditional and could give way to higher prices, margin pressure and a more fragmented global trade landscape.
UK inflation eases to 3.0%, lifting odds of March BoE rate cut
Headline consumer inflation slowed to 3.0% year‑on‑year in January, down from 3.4% in December and marginally above the Bank of England’s 2.9% projection. Combined with signs of weakening in the labour market — higher unemployment and softer private‑sector pay growth — the print increases the probability of a near‑term Bank Rate reduction, though officials remain explicitly data‑dependent.