
Vatican Declines Participation in Trump’s Board of Peace
Decision and diplomatic fallout. The Vatican announced it will not accept a seat on the Board of Peace, a body proposed by President Trump; Rome’s top diplomat said officials were left troubled by parts of the plan and flagged unresolved problems. Cardinal Pietro Parolin emphasized a preference for established international institutions to handle conflict response, signaling the Holy See’s reluctance to back an alternative architecture. Britain, France and Norway have also declined, reducing the number of heavyweight backers ahead of the board’s inaugural meeting.
Principles and papal stance. The Vatican’s choice follows an invitation extended to Pope Leo XIV, who has positioned peacemaking and humanitarian law at the center of his diplomatic agenda. The pope has repeatedly urged attention to Gaza and supported negotiated, rights-based solutions, a posture that contrasts with the new board’s design and the US president’s more unilateral rhetoric. Italy and the European Union plan to attend only as observers, underscoring a cautious regional posture rather than full endorsement.
Operational and geopolitical implications. The group’s original brief — focused on Gaza reconstruction — has been widened into a potential global peace platform and will hold its first session in Washington this week. The prospect of a permanent US chair has contributed to alarm among diplomats who worry about fragmenting the UN’s role and politicizing crisis management. With key states standing aside and only limited observer engagement from major partners, the board faces a credibility shortfall that could hamper fundraising, access, and coordination on reconstruction tasks.
Read Our Expert Analysis
Create an account or login for free to unlock our expert analysis and key takeaways for this development.
By continuing, you agree to receive marketing communications and our weekly newsletter. You can opt-out at any time.
Recommended for you

Trump convenes inaugural Board meeting to marshal Gaza reconstruction
President Trump is chairing the first meeting of a U.S.-led international council to coordinate Gaza stabilization and rebuilding, building on private diplomacy in Geneva that produced a headline $5 billion donor pledge but few binding commitments. Complementary redevelopment concepts floated at Davos and the Geneva talks — framed by private envoys — raise questions about verification, land rights and whether reconstruction will be conditional on phased disarmament and external security control.

Witkoff and Kushner Drive Trump’s Private Peace Initiative
A Trump-backed delegation led by Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner held concentrated talks in Geneva that produced a 20-point framework, donor pledges including $5 billion and vague promises of stabilization troops, and a negotiated pause that enabled aid and a prisoner exchange. The effort returned negotiations to Europe after Abu Dhabi, delivered limited tactical wins (including a 314-person prisoner swap), but was undercut by a large subsequent strike on Ukrainian energy infrastructure and deep skepticism about compressed timelines for a broader settlement.

Munich report warns Trump-era policies are straining the post‑1945 global order
A Munich Security Report released ahead of the conference concludes that recent US leadership choices are exerting exceptional pressure on the rules-based international system, altering alliances and norms. The report’s polling shows widespread public pessimism in major democracies and helps explain why European capitals are actively recalibrating defence and economic policy in response.

Trump-Herzog Fallout Deepens a Wider Rift Between Washington and Jerusalem
A public rebuke from the U.S. president toward Israel’s president over a pardon request for Benjamin Netanyahu has exposed widening tensions in the bilateral relationship and accelerated private Israeli outreach to Washington on Iran contingency options. The spat sits atop broader strategic disagreements — including U.S. emphasis on nuclear limits versus Israeli focus on missiles, proxies and coercive options — and comes as U.S. military posture and Gulf partner constraints reshape the operational choices available to both capitals.

U.S. Exit From Global Climate Framework Deepens Diplomatic Isolation and Shortens the Clock for Reentry
The U.S. announced plans to leave the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, a move that would formally take effect 12 months after official notification and would sideline the country in formal climate negotiations. Legal experts say a later administration could rejoin the UNFCCC or the Paris accord quickly—using Senate consent for UNFCCC restoration in roughly 90 days or an executive pathway to restore Paris Agreement status within about 30 days—yet the withdrawal will still complicate global cooperation and invite political pushback.

Greenland gambit strains Washington’s ties with Europe's right-wing allies
President Trump’s public push to claim Greenland and subsequent jabs at NATO have unsettled nationalist and populist leaders across Europe, reducing his political leverage. While recent diplomatic talks in Washington have calmed immediate tensions, fallout has already prompted EU citizens and parties to reassess political and commercial ties — notably energy dependencies — eroding short‑term U.S. influence.
IEA ministers end Paris talks without a consensus as US pushes to drop net-zero wording
Senior energy ministers left a Paris meeting without a joint declaration after sharp disagreements between the United States and several European members. The US publicly pressed the IEA to reprioritise metrics over long‑term decarbonisation language and signalled potential funding pressure, while the UK offered targeted funding to back the agency’s clean‑energy work; organisers issued a short chair’s summary instead.