Hungary asks Croatia to allow Russian crude via Adriatic pipeline

Hungary has asked Croatia to enable deliveries of Russian crude through the Adriatic pipeline after a key transit stretch of the Druzhba system was put out of service. Ukrainian authorities have attributed the disruption to a targeted strike on the Ukrainian section of the Druzhba pipeline at the end of January and published photographs documenting burning and damaged infrastructure. The damage forced an immediate suspension of deliveries along the affected stretch, creating an acute shortfall for Hungarian refineries that rely heavily on east–west flows. In response, a joint letter from Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto and Slovak Economy Minister Denisa Sakova asked Zagreb to allow temporary shipments via the Adriatic corridor as a pragmatic workaround to preserve downstream fuel supplies. Redirecting crude to Adriatic-fed terminals would change existing logistics, creating demand for pipeline capacity, tanker loading slots, coastal storage and adjustments to scheduling and contracts. Operators would also need to confirm crude grade compatibility and revise transport and terminal service agreements to accommodate rerouted volumes. For Hungary and Slovakia, access to Adriatic crude would reduce near‑term exposure to land-transit disruptions and help maintain refinery runs for light and heavy products. For Croatia, authorising such flows carries operational strains and politically sensitive optics because allowing transit of Russian-origin oil touches on EU sanctions debates and intra-bloc policy coherence. Budapest’s public insistence on securing supplies — even as Brussels weighs steps to reduce dependence on Russian fuels — underscores the tension between immediate national energy security needs and collective EU strategy. Market participants are likely to watch decisions closely: approvals or refusals can shift short-term freight rates, refinery utilisation and regional wholesale margins, though the immediate market impact will be muted unless the disruption endures or widens. The episode highlights the vulnerability of east–west corridors to conflict-related damage and may accelerate investment in redundancy, storage and alternative sourcing across Central and Eastern Europe. It also raises the prospect of legal and diplomatic follow-ups as affected states document damage and seek accountability and guarantees for restoring uninterrupted flows.