Coinbase Challenges State Bans on Prediction Markets, Defends Federal Derivatives Authority
Context and Chronology
Coinbase has responded to cease-and-desist orders and state enforcement threats by filing suits in four jurisdictions (Connecticut, Illinois, Michigan and Nevada), asserting that exchange-listed event contracts fall within the federal derivatives regime rather than state gambling statutes. The company frames the disputes as a constitutionally and commercially significant test of whether the Commodity Exchange Act and regulatory supervision by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) displace state-level restrictions. Coinbase’s litigation is intertwined with its commercial relationship with Kalshi and other event-contract operators, highlighting how mainstream exchanges and dedicated prediction-market platforms are pushing contested contract designs into courts and agencies to secure national market access.
Regulatory Fault Lines
Central to the litigation is a clash over preemption: Coinbase argues that exchange-traded outcome contracts operate like swaps or futures and therefore fall under CFTC jurisdiction, while several states and a bipartisan cohort of senators have urged continued state and tribal enforcement, sometimes characterizing these products as gambling that should remain within local authority. That political pressure is reflected in a recent letter from 23 senators asking the CFTC to refrain from active participation in pending state and tribal suits and to consider prohibitions on certain contract categories. At the same time, CFTC leadership under Chair Mike Selig has rescinded a 2024 rulemaking notice and a prior staff advisory and signaled a shift toward statute-grounded, rules-based processes—an evolution that complicates the agency’s immediate litigation posture and leaves boundary questions unsettled.
Courts and Stop‑gap Enforcement
Even as agencies debate policy, judges have issued short-term measures that shape market access: a Nevada court temporarily barred Polymarket from serving state residents for 14 days and set an expedited preliminary-injunction hearing, and a Massachusetts judge ordered a 30-day suspension of certain sports contracts. Those orders illustrate how state and tribal enforcement can produce instantaneous, geographically limited disruptions that a federal rulemaking or eventual judicial preemption decision would not immediately reverse.
Market Integrity and Operational Responses
Regulators and judges have raised practical integrity concerns, citing several large, time-sensitive trades that appear similar to insider wagers and noting that on‑chain transaction visibility can amplify surveillance questions without resolving attribution. In anticipation of regulatory fragmentation, platform operators and liquidity providers are implementing geofencing, enhanced KYC, trade-monitoring, wallet-attribution tools and delisting options for U.S. customers on contentious products. Kalshi, for example, has expanded Washington policy staffing amid heavy trading volumes, and other firms are balancing aggressive litigation with investments in compliance and surveillance infrastructure to limit near-term enforcement risk.
Political and Legislative Crosscurrents
The disputes also interact with congressional deliberations over market structure and crypto policy. Coinbase’s recent retreat from a high-profile congressional draft has added friction to near-term markups, while White House convenings and bipartisan committee discussions aim for narrow, targeted statutory fixes—particularly to clarify CFTC scope, custody definitions, and certain token mechanics. Negotiators are weighing procedural leverage, including tying statutory effective dates to commission quorums, which could turn confirmations into bargaining chips and slow any tidy legislative resolution.
Wider Implications
A judicial or statutory endorsement of federal exclusivity would permit national platforms to roll out event contracts broadly, lowering operational complexity and likely attracting institutional liquidity; conversely, sustained state victories or active congressional restraints could force state-by-state compliance, geofencing, or product withdrawals that shrink U.S. access and push activity offshore. Because courts are issuing provisional injunctions now, the near-term landscape is a patchwork of access and enforcement even as longer-term boundaries remain contested among agencies, legislators and industry actors. The outcome will reprice compliance budgets, alter where institutional flows settle, and determine whether prediction markets scale under a unified federal framework or fragment across jurisdictions.
Read Our Expert Analysis
Create an account or login for free to unlock our expert analysis and key takeaways for this development.
By continuing, you agree to receive marketing communications and our weekly newsletter. You can opt-out at any time.
Recommended for you
Kalshi and Polymarket Face State Lawsuits Challenging Prediction Markets
State prosecutors have filed suits and obtained short-term court orders against U.S.-facing prediction platforms, while federal agencies and some senators send mixed signals about whether these products belong under securities/commodities law or state gambling statutes. The litigation has already produced temporary injunctions, aggressive defensive tactics by firms (geofencing, KYC, policy hires) and a credible near-term risk that trading shifts to offshore or crypto-native venues, degrading onshore price signals.
SEC chair signals prediction markets are a regulatory flashpoint
SEC Chair Paul Atkins told senators prediction markets present a pressing jurisdictional challenge and that the SEC is coordinating with the CFTC to address overlapping authority. The CFTC has moved to reframe oversight, withdrawing a prior rulemaking notice while state actions — most notably a temporary Nevada injunction against Polymarket — underscore immediate operational risks for U.S. platforms.
Senators urge CFTC to avoid intervening in prediction-market lawsuits
A bipartisan group of 23 senators asked the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to refrain from intervening in state and tribal litigation over prediction‑market contracts and urged the agency to bar categories of wagers such as sports and violent‑activity outcomes. The appeal comes as the CFTC, under Chair Mike Selig, has withdrawn prior guidance and signaled a statutes‑based rulemaking while state courts — including a recent temporary Nevada order and a Massachusetts pause on sports markets — press conflicting enforcement outcomes.
NYSE warns prediction platforms are shaping market moves
NYSE leadership says real-time, blockchain-based forecasting is increasingly treated as a usable probability signal by traders and institutions; major market operators and liquidity providers are taking stakes in platforms even as federal and state authorities clash over oversight and enforcement.
Davos Cold Shoulder: Big U.S. Banks Push Back on Coinbase Over Stablecoin Rules
At Davos, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong was met with curt and dismissive responses from several leading U.S. bank chiefs as he lobbied against language in an active Senate stablecoin bill. The exchanges at the World Economic Forum track with a broader, paused CLARITY Act process — including a looming Agriculture Committee markup and a White House convening — that will decide whether non-bank platforms can offer repeat, interest‑like payouts on stablecoins.
HSBC: Coinbase Withdrawal Won’t Kill U.S. Crypto Market-Structure Push
Coinbase publicly withdrew support for a congressional market-structure draft, creating friction for near-term markups, but HSBC analysts say a narrower, committee-level compromise could still deliver the statutory certainty institutions seek. The White House has scheduled a targeted convening next week—organized by its digital-assets advisory council—to try to resolve a specific dispute over reward-like incentives tied to stablecoins, a move that could produce language suitable for quick committee amendments.
Nevada (US) Court Issues Temporary Restraining Order Halting Polymarket Activity for State Residents
A Nevada judge granted a 14-day temporary restraining order preventing Polymarket’s operator from offering event-based contracts to residents while the state’s gaming regulator pursues enforcement. The ruling explicitly questions claims that federal commodities law preempts state gambling statutes and sets up a preliminary injunction hearing on Feb. 11, 2026.
How on‑chain prediction markets are surfacing U.S. operational secrets
Permissionless markets that timestamp bets and record trades on public ledgers are creating an unintended intelligence stream by making high‑confidence wagers tied to classified actions visible in real time. Recent episodes where large crypto positions aligned perfectly with U.S. policy moves expose a gap between traditional enforcement frameworks and a new class of operational leaks.