Ethereum: Buterin’s Base‑Layer Scaling Roadmap
Context and Chronology
On Feb. 27, Vitalik Buterin published a public sketch of engineering and economic changes intended to lift Ethereum's base‑layer usable throughput without forcing heavier resource requirements on full‑node operators. The near‑term element emphasizes engineering edits that let clients validate different parts of a block in parallel, combined with fee‑reweighting that raises the price of permanent storage while lowering short‑lived computational friction. These moves are explicitly framed as complementary to rollups: they lower the cost of routine on‑chain execution while keeping security and decentralization as binding constraints.
Technical proposals and primitives
Practically, the roadmap bundles three vectors: (1) parallel validation and block‑construction changes to increase how much useful work fits inside the canonical ~12‑second processing window, (2) a repricing of transient compute versus durable state to discourage ledger bloat and preserve node affordability, and (3) expanded reliance on detachable data units ("blobs") plus broader use of zero‑knowledge proofs so validators need not fully replay every transaction. Buterin pairs these with calls to prune rarely used legacy logic from core clients and to make wallet and lightweight‑client tooling an explicit engineering priority.
Where this sits in the Foundation’s plan
Other public materials from core developers and the Ethereum Foundation situate Buterin’s sketches inside a longer, sequenced strawmap: a multi‑year engineering dependency graph that links capacity, slot/finality cadence, post‑quantum (PQ) transitions and privacy work. That public roadmap names near‑term coordination points (notably an H1 2026 "Glamsterdam" window and later forks often discussed under names like Hegota) to stage interlocking work rather than promise a single instantaneous leap.
Numeric objectives and trade‑offs
Planning conversations reference ambitious numeric targets that exceed the immediate sketch: working discussions have floated gas ceilings past ~100,000,000 and community threads have cited figures near ~180,000,000; separate strawmap commentary frames long‑run L1 throughput aims on the order of ~10,000 tps when closely coupled with ZK proving, and slot/finality compression goals suggest a staged move from ~12s toward the single‑digit or ~2s band. Those targets come with non‑linear resource implications for propagation, prover stacks, and PQ‑capable key management.
Governance, inclusion and legal questions
Related work discussed publicly includes inclusion‑enforcement proposals (e.g., developer discussions around EIP‑7805/FOCIL) and account‑abstraction upgrades (e.g., EIP‑8141) that aim to reduce sequencing censorship and improve native wallet UX. These items create governance and legal trade‑offs: inclusion enforcement may expose validators to new operational and regulatory liability if they are required to honor curated inclusion lists, and account‑abstraction plus PQ transitions require coordinated client and wallet upgrades.
Implementation dependencies and risks
A recurring caveat is that theoretical throughput and UX gains depend on synchronous, cross‑client implementation: parallel validation requires clients to adopt new execution patterns safely; higher gas ceilings and shorter slots demand improved network propagation and mempool flow control; and PQ replacements are currently estimated at roughly ~20% progress across subsystems, creating an explicit dependency between cryptographic readiness and upgrade cadence. If any of these pieces lag, calendar targets will slip or feature scope will be trimmed.
Market and product implications
If realized, the plan recalibrates incentives for rollups, L2 integrators and application teams: some builders will continue to pursue trustless, L1‑equivalent rollups, while others may lean into operator‑centric or compliance‑focused models and disclose those trade‑offs openly. Startups that depend on predictable, low‑cost transient execution will gain options to keep heavier data off the canonical state by using blobs or zk‑backed durability primitives; archival and blob‑storage businesses could capture new demand as permanent storage becomes pricier.
Bottom line
Buterin’s notes push the community toward coordinated engineering work that pairs short‑term, low‑risk compiler/validation changes with longer‑horizon cryptographic and data‑layer shifts. That combination promises material utility gains but requires careful cross‑client rollout, clearer product disclosure across the L2 ecosystem, and explicit governance answers for inclusion enforcement and PQ migration — otherwise the benefits will be delayed or concentrated among better‑resourced operators.
Read Our Expert Analysis
Create an account or login for free to unlock our expert analysis and key takeaways for this development.
By continuing, you agree to receive marketing communications and our weekly newsletter. You can opt-out at any time.
Recommended for you

Global: Vitalik Buterin Recasts Layer‑2s as a Spectrum, Not Ethereum’s Future Backbone
Vitalik Buterin argues that recent L1 capacity and planned simplifications reduce the case for rollups as the singular scaling path and urges layer‑2 teams to stop implying they inherit full Ethereum security unless they meet strict decentralization standards. He ties this market repositioning to a broader 2026 agenda — protocol “cleanup,” lightweight clients, privacy tooling and governance changes — that together shift value toward explicit guarantees and differentiated product features.
Vitalik Buterin pushes cypherpunk refactor as FOCIL added to Ethereum roadmap
Vitalik Buterin is framing 2026 as a coordinated campaign to restore user control, privacy and simplification to Ethereum while core developers have added a controversial inclusion-enforcement mechanism (EIP-7805, aka FOCIL) and an account-abstraction upgrade (EIP-8141) to the protocol roadmap. The schedule pairs a nearer-term Glamsterdam upgrade (H1 2026) with a FOCIL-centered Hegota hard fork targeted for later in 2026, and the Foundation is also advancing post-quantum work, lightweight-client efforts and higher block compute targets to support the plan.
Vitalik Recasts Ethereum’s Scaling Story as Ecosystem Shifts Toward Security and Openness
Ethereum’s co‑founder signaled a strategic reassessment of a rollup‑first scaling narrative as on‑chain capacity and lower fees change the calculus for layer‑2 projects. At the same time, the industry is advancing open miner tooling, formal post‑quantum planning, fresh DeFi rails for XRP, and a major analytics funding round — together forcing clearer security guarantees, governance choices and multi‑year migration plans.
Buterin Calls for ‘Garbage Collection’ to Unclog Ethereum’s Protocol Stack
Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin is urging the community to treat protocol simplification as a first‑class upgrade: formally removing or demoting low‑value legacy features, simplifying client codepaths, and strengthening primitives so the protocol remains inspectable and reimplementable. He pairs that call with broader recommendations — from streamlined full‑node workflows and private payment primitives to governance and DAO design changes — and stresses careful migration paths to avoid breaking existing apps.
Buterin Frames 2026 as the Year Ethereum Reclaims User Control and Privacy
Vitalik Buterin is calling for 2026 to be a coordinated effort to restore user sovereignty across Ethereum by combining protocol simplification, privacy tooling and UX changes. He urges pruning legacy complexity, improving on-chain infrastructure such as oracles and DAO workflows, and shipping wallet and client features (privacy frameworks like Kohaku, Helios-style lightweight clients, account abstraction and social recovery) that reduce reliance on centralized services.

Ethereum Foundation publishes seven-fork 'strawmap' targeting sub-second ambitions
The Ethereum Foundation published a seven-fork engineering strawmap that chains explicit performance and cryptography goals — labeled as fast L1, gigagas L1 and teragas L2 — and pairs a long-range sequencing horizon with nearer-term coordination points (notably the H1 2026 “Glamsterdam” window). The paper formalizes dependencies through 2029 while the Foundation has also operationalized a post-quantum program (multi-client PQ devnets, ~20% progress) and flagged related EIPs and capacity upgrades infrastructure vendors must absorb.

Vitalik Buterin directs 16,384 ETH (~$43M) toward open-source Ethereum development
Vitalik Buterin has converted 16,384 ETH, roughly $43 million at current prices, to finance a program focused on building an auditable, end-to-end software and hardware stack while the Ethereum Foundation tightens discretionary spending. The move signals a shift toward targeted, resilience-focused investment in decentralization, privacy, and verifiability as the Foundation manages resources more conservatively.

Ethereum Foundation Accelerates Slots and Finality, Targets Quantum-Resistant Chain
The Ethereum Foundation roadmap compresses block slot time from 12s toward 2s and aims to cut finality from minutes to under 16s , pairing cadence changes with a formal post-quantum migration program (multi-client devnets and candidate precompiles). Public artifacts (including Vitalik Buterin’s notes and the Strawmap ) and named coordination points such as the H1 2026 “Glamsterdam” window make the plan a sequenced, multi-year campaign rather than a single hard fork.