Aave Labs Faces Governance Audit Ahead of $51M Funding Vote
Context and Chronology
A governance flashpoint arrived when the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) published a forensic review timed before a Snapshot asking tokenholders to back a $51M expansion. The ACI paper re-examines cumulative capital tied to the protocol’s primary product team and contends that public reporting has been insufficient for a decision of this scale. That scrutiny now sits alongside a separate governance package from Aave Labs that would make the V4 technical upgrade the focal point for future product expansion and route revenue from Aave-branded apps and enterprise services to the community treasury.
What the Audit Alleges
ACI attributes about $86M to the product organization, split across token-sale proceeds, venture funding, DAO disbursements and redirected swap fees. The review spots a founding-team retention of roughly 23% of legacy token supply and flags opacity around personal holdings. Using Horizon — the RWA market — as an example, the audit argues headline TVL masks concentrated stablecoin exposure and a narrow set of true RWA counterparties, while revenue math suggests incentive spending dwarfs collector receipts.
Numbers and Concentration Risks
Key figures include a claimed Horizon total supply near $466M, approximately 69% stablecoins and 31% RWA collateral. The audit alleges three addresses control about 59% of a major pool, reducing the effective RWA base toward $135M. On revenue, ACI contrasts cumulative collector receipts of roughly $216,000 with incentive spend of ~$4.2M (Merkl incentives), producing an operational ratio the report characterizes as spending many dollars to earn one.
Fee Routing, Proposed Revenue Changes and Contradictions
ACI accuses team-controlled actors of altering referral fee routing midstream and diverting basis-point fees into an address it links to internal control, tallying distributions near 933 ETH across L1 and L2. That specific allegation sits uneasily beside Aave Labs’ public governance package, which proposes to route future revenue from consumer apps and enterprise offerings to the DAO treasury — a structural change intended to increase community capture of product economics. The apparent contradiction is central: the Labs’ proposal promises clearer future revenue flows to the treasury even as the forensic review raises questions about past and current routing that would need resolution before delegations can comfortably accept a large discretionary grant.
Operational Continuity and Political Context
Compounding the governance debate, BGD Labs announced it will cease active core contributions on April 1, offering transition documentation and proposing an optional security retainer of $200,000 through June. BGD’s exit underscores an operational continuity risk precisely when the DAO is being asked to approve major funding and a product consolidation around V4. Market reaction has been muted but included a modest uptick in AAVE’s price after the governance package was tabled, a sign that some investors welcome the V4 commercial thesis even as forensic scrutiny intensifies.
Immediate Strategic Implications
For token delegations, external vendors and institutional partners, the combined picture is clear: approving a large, discretionary grant without addressing past routing and disclosure gaps raises counterparty, legal and reputational risk. If the Snapshot passes without added transparency guardrails, expect counterparties to require milestone‑based tranches, escrow arrangements or on‑chain accountability. Conversely, a rejection or delay could freeze product launches tied to V4, slow institutional integrations and reprice how DAOs fund development.
Read Our Expert Analysis
Create an account or login for free to unlock our expert analysis and key takeaways for this development.
By continuing, you agree to receive marketing communications and our weekly newsletter. You can opt-out at any time.
Recommended for you
Aave Labs advances plan to funnel all product revenue into DAO using V4 roadmap
Aave Labs has proposed a governance framework that would make its upcoming V4 upgrade the platform’s growth spine and direct 100% of revenue from Aave-branded products to the DAO treasury. The move is pitched as alignment between development incentives and token holders but revives disputes over control of brand assets and the legal structures needed to protect intellectual property.
BGD Labs to end core development role at Aave as governance dispute widens
BGD Labs will stop contributing to the Aave DAO after its service contract finishes on April 1 and has proposed a short-term $200,000 security retainer while publishing handover documentation. The exit amplifies tensions with Aave Labs’ governance package — which ties a modular V4 rollout to routing revenue from Aave-branded apps and enterprise tools into the DAO and creating a legal vehicle for IP — raising operational and governance continuity questions.
Bitwise CIO says DeFi governance shifts could spark market recovery
Bitwise’s CIO argues that concrete governance reforms that route protocol revenue to DAOs, together with increasing institutional allocations, make DeFi a primary candidate to lead a market recovery. He points to Aave’s proposal to funnel product proceeds to its treasury as a real-world test of tokenomics that, if enacted, could attract allocators hunting durable cash flows.
Sequoia Joins Anthropic Funding Push, Forcing a Rethink of VC Conflict Rules
Sequoia Capital is reported to be among the investors in a multibillion-dollar Anthropic financing that would sharply increase the AI startup’s private valuation and signal a softening of long-standing VC norms against backing direct rivals. The size and composition of the syndicate — including sovereign wealth, hedge funds and conditional strategic commitments from cloud and chip providers — also underscores investor interest in commercial-scale safety, observability and governance tooling as model builders race to scale.
Buterin Pushes for a New Wave of DAOs, Targeting Oracles, Privacy and Governance Fatigue
Vitalik Buterin urged developers to build a new generation of DAOs that treat oracles, privacy and governance UX as core infrastructure rather than add-ons. He recommended technical priorities—stronger oracle economics, zero-knowledge privacy layers, on-chain dispute mechanisms, and tooling to reduce voter fatigue—while tying those ideas to broader protocol health and upgrade practices.
Vitalik Buterin proposes AI stewards to rework DAO governance
Vitalik Buterin proposed individualized "AI stewards" that would cast votes on users’ behalf for routine DAO decisions using zero‑knowledge proofs and confidential compute to prevent coercion and preserve private preferences. His plan pairs cryptographic attestations, prediction‑market economic filters and agent registries to scale participation while raising new trade‑offs between on‑chain transparency and off‑chain service centralization.
Grayscale Seeks SEC Approval to Convert Aave Trust into NYSE Arca ETF
Grayscale filed a Form S-1 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to convert its existing Aave trust into an exchange-traded fund, aiming to list on NYSE Arca under the ticker GAVE with Coinbase as custodian and a 2.5% annual fee. The proposed ETF would hold AAVE tokens directly, setting up a direct-exposure product that will compete with Bitwise’s blended AAVE strategy and test U.S. regulatory appetite for altcoin ETFs.
Modal Labs pursues funding that would value the inference startup near $2.5B
Modal Labs is in talks for a financing that could value the inference-focused infrastructure startup at roughly $2.5 billion, against an annualized revenue run rate near $50 million and reported interest from General Catalyst. The discussions come as investors also place sizable bets across adjacent AI-infrastructure niches—such as model interpretability and domain-focused foundation models—signaling broad appetite for enterprise-ready layers of the AI stack.