US Delegation Opens Nuclear Arms-Control Talks with China in Geneva
US delegation begins Geneva nuclear engagements
A US team attending sessions at the United Nations Conference on Disarmament is holding sequential talks with nuclear peers in Geneva this week; diplomats met with Russia on Monday and are scheduled to talk with China the following day. The exchange is part of an effort initiated by the current US administration to restart substantive arms control diplomacy that would involve both Moscow and Beijing.
Officials described the meetings as exploratory rather than treaty-signing sessions; they are designed to map out negotiating parameters, identify mutual concerns, and test whether all parties will accept a structured, time-bound process. The US side is using Geneva’s disarmament forum to convene bilateral and potentially trilateral contacts without committing to detailed modalities in public. That discretion aims to preserve diplomatic flexibility while signaling seriousness to allies and domestic audiences.
Observers should note two tactical elements: the US has prioritized face-to-face contacts to re-establish channels frozen or frayed in recent years, and it is sequencing conversations—Russia first, then China—to calibrate positions and tailor follow-up offers. The venue in Switzerland provides neutral ground and procedural cover for technical exchanges on verification, deterrence stability, and limits on deployable warheads. Expect preparatory working groups on verification standards and exchange of red lines before any formal negotiating timetable is announced.
This outreach matters because it reframes arms control from a bilateral US–Russia relic into a potential trilateral architecture that must account for China’s expanding nuclear forces. If the three states enter a sustained process, it would force adjustments across military planning, alliance consultations, and non-proliferation diplomacy. For now, Geneva is a staging area: low-profile, high-leverage, and intended to produce a clear recommendation on next steps within months rather than years.
Read Our Expert Analysis
Create an account or login for free to unlock our expert analysis and key takeaways for this development.
By continuing, you agree to receive marketing communications and our weekly newsletter. You can opt-out at any time.
Recommended for you
Trump Signals Indirect Role as US–Iran Nuclear Talks Open in Geneva
President Trump says he will retain an indirect hand in Geneva talks as U.S. and Iranian delegates resume negotiations focused on nuclear limits and sequencing of sanctions relief. The diplomatic opening follows Oman-mediated contacts, Iran’s conditional concessions on some enriched material, and a visible U.S. military surge — including carrier movements and regional aviation drills — that raises the stakes for miscalculation at sea.
U.S. Accuses China of Covert Nuclear Explosions, Raising Arms‑Control Alarm
U.S. officials publicly stated that China carried out at least one concealed nuclear explosive event and is preparing further low‑yield tests. The allegation, denied by Beijing, intensifies questions about the erosion of post‑Cold War testing norms and could reshape international arms control dynamics.
U.S. and Iran Hold Second Nuclear Talks in Geneva as Military Tensions Rise
U.S. and Iranian delegations met in Geneva on Feb. 17, 2026, for a second round of nuclear negotiations even as regional military activity — including stepped-up U.S. carrier movements and reported maritime incidents — raised the risk of a dangerous miscalculation. Diplomats continue to press technical verification and sequencing, while Tehran insists that reversible sanctions relief be part of any substantive trade‑off.
U.S.-Facilitated Geneva Talks Resume as Energy Truce Collapses and Delegation Shifts Raise Doubts
A third U.S.-mediated round between Russia and Ukraine is set for Feb. 17–18 in Geneva after two Abu Dhabi sessions, but renewed strikes on power infrastructure and a change in the Russian negotiating lead make a substantive breakthrough unlikely. Tactical steps — a prisoner swap and a short halt to energy-targeted attacks — have eased immediate pressures but collapsed quickly, exposing gaps in verification and enforcement that will complicate any push for a political settlement by June.
Jared Kushner, Steve Witkoff to Attend Geneva U.S.–Iran Talks
Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff are flying to Geneva to press a narrowly focused, private-led round of U.S.–Iran engagement intended to lower immediate tensions and buy time against the backdrop of stepped-up U.S. military signaling. Reporting from parallel accounts indicates the Geneva session produced a nonbinding 20-point framework and discrete operational gains — including a reported 314-person prisoner exchange and a $5 billion donor pledge — but those payoffs are conditional and fragile amid compressed timelines and maritime incidents.
Iran Signals Conditional Willingness to Resume Nuclear Talks as Regional Tensions Rise
Iran signalled conditional openness to nuclear negotiations with the United States but insisted talks be equal, non-coercive and exclude its defensive forces and missile programmes. The move occurs amid a heightened security posture — including a US carrier strike group deployment — a recent deadly domestic security operation and sharp economic strain, all of which complicate the narrow diplomatic window and raise risks of inadvertent escalation.
US Signs Nuclear Cooperation Pact with Armenia, Unlocking Up to $9 Billion
Washington and Yerevan concluded a legal framework that allows American nuclear firms to export technology and services to Armenia, creating a potential $9 billion investment pipeline. The deal paves the way for replacing the Soviet-era Metsamor reactor—today responsible for roughly 40% of Armenia’s power—with modern small modular reactors and shifts Yerevan’s energy alignments away from Moscow.
Iran Nuclear Program: US Talks Stall After Strikes on Facilities
Diplomatic talks between Washington and Tehran have stalled after strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, elevating the risk of further military escalation and complicating verification. The 2015 limits-based agreement remains the reference, but weakened inspection access and hardened political positions make a swift return to that framework unlikely.