
Ofcom fines 8579 LLC £1.35m for age-verification lapses
Ofcom levies major penalty against 8579 LLC for missing age checks
Enforcement action: The UK regulator imposed a primary penalty of £1.35m on 8579 LLC for failing to put in place adequate age-verification measures across its adult websites.
Follow-on sanction: An extra £50,000 was added because the company did not answer Ofcom’s information requests, and additional daily fines were threatened if remaining requirements are not met.
Scope and timing: Ofcom’s findings cover site activity from late July through at least mid-November 2025, a window during which required age checks were not implemented on most of the operator’s properties.
Immediate compliance demands: The regulator ordered 8579 LLC to install robust age controls on its final non-compliant site by a stated deadline or face a £1,000 per day penalty, and to hand over a complete list of all domains it runs or risk £250 per day fines.
Regulatory posture: Ofcom framed the action as part of a broader drive to enforce the UK’s Online Safety Act obligations, moving quickly after age-check rules came into effect in mid‑2025.
Industry response: Operators in the adult-content sector, including the parent of a major brand, argued the new regime has produced unintended consequences such as traffic displacement toward less regulated spaces online.
Enforcement precedent: This decision is the largest fine applied so far under the Online Safety Act and establishes a high-water mark for penalties tied to age-verification failures.
Operational impact: The ruling compels platform owners to accelerate deployment of compliant age-gating technology and to build more thorough compliance teams and record-keeping to avoid escalating daily fines.
Public-safety framing: Ofcom presented the measures as necessary to reduce minors’ exposure to explicit material, while critics warn of migration to unregulated channels if mainstream sites become harder to access.
Near-term outlook: Expect more rapid, visible enforcement actions against adult sites that fail to satisfy the Online Safety Act’s age-control standards and additional requirements around transparency about domain portfolios.
Read Our Expert Analysis
Create an account or login for free to unlock our expert analysis and key takeaways for this development.
By continuing, you agree to receive marketing communications and our weekly newsletter. You can opt-out at any time.
Recommended for you
Pornhub to block many UK visitors as new age-verification deadline looms
Parent company Aylo will make Pornhub inaccessible to new UK visitors after February 2 unless they complete the required age checks; previously verified accounts remain functional. Aylo warns that restrictive verification rules may push users toward unregulated sites and raises privacy and enforcement concerns.

Brazil to Require Age Verification to Block Teen Access to Gambling and Adult Content
Brazil is drafting rules that would force app stores, platforms and sites that run ads to verify users’ ages and block minors from gambling, pornography and other adult services. The proposal echoes moves in Europe and the UK and raises enforcement, privacy and compliance trade‑offs for global and local tech firms.

Federal Court imposes A$14 million penalty on BPS Financial and bars unlicensed crypto operations for a decade
Australia’s markets regulator won a Federal Court judgment forcing BPS Financial to pay A$14 million for promoting and operating its Qoin Wallet without required authorisation and for misleading representations. The court also ordered a 10-year prohibition on running unlicensed financial services, mandated publicity steps and assigned most legal costs to BPS.

Los Angeles County sues Roblox over alleged child-safety lapses
Los Angeles County filed a civil suit alleging Roblox failed to protect minors by operating weak moderation and age-verification systems. The action adds to a mounting wave of legal and regulatory pressure — domestically and abroad — as governments from multiple U.S. states to Australia and Egypt press for demonstrable safety controls and, in some cases, consider access restrictions or reclassification.

Australia Rebukes Major Tech Firms Over Failures to Curb Child Sexual Abuse Material
Australia’s government publicly condemned large technology platforms for failing to stop the spread of child sexual abuse content, pressing for faster detection, clearer reporting and stronger enforcement. Officials signalled tougher oversight and potential regulatory steps that would force platforms to change moderation practices and cooperation with law enforcement.

German regulator fines Amazon €70 million and orders end to pricing controls
Germany’s competition authority has concluded that Amazon unlawfully influenced third-party seller pricing and has imposed a roughly €70 million fine while requiring the company to stop its pricing-control practices. The ruling forces Amazon to change contract terms and creates a precedent tightening antitrust scrutiny of dominant online marketplaces across Europe.
UK proposes 48-hour takedown rule for non-consensual intimate images
A UK parliamentary amendment would require online platforms to remove non-consensual intimate images within 48 hours of a victim’s report and to block further re-uploads, with fines up to 10% of global revenue for non-compliance. The proposal also seeks to extend duties to generative AI and chat interfaces and would give regulators (notably Ofcom) expedited powers to demand technical mitigations and pre-deployment risk assessments.

UK moves to force AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Grok to block illegal content under Online Safety Act
The UK government will amend the Crime and Policing Bill to bind AI conversational agents to duties in the Online Safety Act , creating enforceable obligations and penalties for failing to prevent illegal content. The move, prompted by recent product-testing and regulatory probes into services such as xAI’s Grok, equips regulators to impose faster child-safety measures including a proposed minimum social media age and limits on attention‑maximising features.