Warren presses Fed and Treasury to avoid rescuing crypto elites
Warren urges regulators to refuse taxpayer-funded crypto rescues
Senator Elizabeth Warren delivered a formal written protest to top financial officials, explicitly demanding they not use public resources to steady crypto markets. The letter was addressed to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and asked for clear, written prohibitions on direct purchases, guarantees, or liquidity facilities that could prop up token prices.
Warren framed the risk as a transfer of wealth from ordinary taxpayers to well-capitalized digital-asset owners and pressed for clarity about any contingency plans. She noted that verbal responses she has received from officials were insufficient and asked the agencies to detail legal authorities and internal guardrails so that any future decisions would be transparent to Congress and the public.
Her intervention comes amid acute market volatility: Bitcoin has retraced more than half of its peak value and recently traded near a $60,000 level — a drawdown Warren cites as the immediate context for concern about rescue-like actions by policymakers.
The letter also follows fresh disclosures about World Liberty Financial that have intensified the political stakes. Newly revealed filings show an Abu Dhabi-linked investment vehicle acquired a near‑majority 49% stake in World Liberty in January 2025 for roughly $500 million; roughly $187 million of that sum reportedly flowed to entities controlled by the Trump family, while other amounts went to affiliates of developer Steve Witkoff and company founders. Executives linked to Emirati interests subsequently took board seats, and affiliates of the purchaser moved about $2 billion into Binance using the firm’s stablecoin, raising questions about custody, sanction compliance and beneficial‑ownership transparency.
Those disclosures have already prompted Senator Warren to call for congressional hearings and potential subpoenas to examine whether private financial arrangements influenced policy decisions or created conflicts. The convergence of cross‑border capital flows, rapid ownership changes and large token transfers increases reputational and national‑security scrutiny of the firm and of any regulatory decisions that could be perceived as favoring connected actors.
At the Federal Reserve, the policy debate is evolving in a different direction. Fed Governor Chris Waller has described a proposal to offer narrow central‑bank account access for certain nonbank payment and fintech firms — an approach designed to reduce settlement frictions while explicitly limiting spillovers to the broader payments and reserve system. The draft framework would deny interest on balances, exclude participants from Fed credit windows and impose balance caps; public comments on the proposal split along industry lines and the final timetable remains uncertain.
Taken together, Warren’s letter and the other developments create both political and prudential constraints on aggressive intervention. Even where legal authority exists, actions that resemble bailouts would face intense public and congressional backlash, reducing the practical likelihood of asset purchases, explicit guarantees, or broad liquidity backstops for crypto markets.
Market participants are likely to respond by repricing the probability of government support, which should raise risk premia and increase funding costs for some crypto firms. Short‑term volatility may rise as counterparties reassess the availability of official backstops and as oversight and compliance demands mount for firms with politically sensitive investors or opaque ownership structures.
For regulators and lawmakers, the episode underscores two near‑term priorities: (1) clearer public documentation of legal authorities and operational guardrails that would govern any extraordinary actions; and (2) intensified oversight of foreign investments, token flows and custody practices tied to firms with rapid ownership changes. For taxpayers, Warren’s stance reduces moral hazard but shifts the burden of stabilization toward private markets and existing enforcement tools.
- Key metric highlighted: Bitcoin drawdown exceeds 50%.
- Governance disclosure: World Liberty Financial: 49% stake acquired Jan. 2025 (~$500M), ~$187M routed to Trump‑linked entities, ~$2B moved into Binance via the firm’s stablecoin.
- Policy development: Fed draft for narrow central‑bank accounts — no interest, no credit access, balance caps — faces mixed industry response.
Read Our Expert Analysis
Create an account or login for free to unlock our expert analysis and key takeaways for this development.
By continuing, you agree to receive marketing communications and our weekly newsletter. You can opt-out at any time.
Recommended for you
Warren Presses Fed Nominees to Pledge Protection for Regional Research
Sen. Elizabeth Warren is demanding that incoming Federal Reserve nominees commit to protecting the independence of research produced at regional Reserve Banks after a White House economic official publicly assailed a New York Fed paper. The dispute — amplified by warnings from regional Fed leaders, a Justice Department inquiry and tense Senate testimony from Treasury officials — raises the odds of a contentious confirmation fight and could deepen pressures that chill politically sensitive Fed studies.
Fed Governor Waller: Crypto Euphoria Ebbs as Wall Street Links Deepen
Federal Reserve Governor Chris Waller says the early surge in crypto enthusiasm has cooled as mainstream financial firms increase exposure and rebalance risk; he outlined a Fed plan for narrowly scoped central-bank accounts for select fintechs and crypto firms while acknowledging public debate and political scrutiny that may slow final rulemaking.
