Regional US Banks Partner with Cari Network to Tokenize Customer Deposits
Strategic pivot and objectives. Several regional lenders have teamed up to prototype a system that places deposit balances onto a distributed ledger, aiming to create a new payments and custody rail that rivals emerging digital platforms. The consortium—working with the Cari Network—frames the work as a defensive retention strategy to capture customers and fee pools that might otherwise migrate to crypto-first providers or privately issued stablecoins. Internal design discussions began late last year and prototypes are now in early build phases; banks emphasize that on-chain claims would remain bank liabilities and subject to existing depositor protections and prudential oversight.
Technical partners and governance. Participating banks are contributing product and compliance expertise alongside the Cari Network, exploring permissioned ledger architectures and token standards that map directly to insured deposit claims. The group is prioritizing onshore operational control, regulator-friendly governance and integrated identity and compliance tooling so KYC/AML checks can be embedded into settlement flows. That focus reflects practical constraints: uneven legal clarity about on‑chain money, the need to digitalize identity and compliance, and lingering questions around throughput, latency and settlement finality that matter for high-volume flows and custody-integrated products.
Market implications and next steps. If pilots validate legal equivalence, reserve placement and automated compliance, banks could shorten settlement windows, enable programmable deposit features (conditional transfers, instant cross-bank movement) and offer new custody and product layers to institutional clients. Regulators and supervisors are expected to be closely involved as the consortium tests reserve visibility and insolvency sequencing so tokenized deposits do not create counterparty ambiguity. The project also reflects a broader industry trend toward hybrid models—bank-issued, on-chain money under constrained frameworks—that seek to preserve monetary transmission and limit cross-border leakage; failure to resolve legal or infrastructure gaps, however, could push activity onto platform-led rails or private settlement assets instead. Expect phased pilots, continued coordination with supervisors, and possible efforts to codify standards or licensing approaches that other regional banks could later join.
Read Our Expert Analysis
Create an account or login for free to unlock our expert analysis and key takeaways for this development.
By continuing, you agree to receive marketing communications and our weekly newsletter. You can opt-out at any time.
Recommended for you
Banks Embrace Tokenized Deposits to Reassert Control Over Digital Money
Incumbent banks are moving to tokenized bank deposits — on-chain representations of existing liabilities — to capture blockchain settlement efficiencies while keeping deposit risk and supervision inside regulated balance sheets. That shift responds to modelling showing stablecoins can erode domestic deposits and is constrained by legal recognition, identity/compliance automation and core infrastructure limits such as throughput, finality and transaction-ordering risks.

Coinbase draws net deposits from US community banks, KlariVis finds
A KlariVis transaction analysis shows customer transfers to Coinbase outpaced returns by about 2.77:1 across a sample of community banks, producing a net shift of roughly $78.3 million over 13 months. The study flags concentrated outflows from money market balances and estimates meaningful reductions in small-bank lending capacity if the pattern scales nationally.



