Reform UK pledges to narrow Bank of England remit and reshape OBR forecasting

Reform UK plans to refocus the Bank of England on price stability by removing responsibilities that the party deems peripheral, while requiring the Office for Budget Responsibility to publish broader alternative forecasts. The move, set out by Treasury spokesman Robert Jenrick, singles out climate-related duties for removal so the central bank can prioritize controlling inflation above secondary objectives. Narrowing the BoE remit would sharpen its legal mandate to target inflation, but it risks politicising operational scope and could unsettle market expectations about monetary regime stability. For the OBR, the policy demands inclusion of a greater diversity of opinion in official projections, effectively injecting scenario plurality into the UK fiscal forecasting process.

Operationally, extracting climate work from the central bank shifts responsibilities to ministers or specialist agencies and may create short-term capacity gaps in risk assessment frameworks. Investors and rating analysts will watch whether the change alters forward guidance, gilt issuance plans, or the BoE’s tolerance for temporary overshoots of the inflation target. Requiring the OBR to present multiple forecast paths increases transparency about model uncertainty but could also amplify political pressure on fiscal choices by legitimizing downside scenarios. The proposal intersects with broader debates on central bank independence, fiscal credibility, and how macro-institutions adapt to cross-cutting policy challenges like climate transition.

If implemented, the package could prompt recalibration of market risk premia as participants reassess the institutional firebreaks that separate monetary policy from political priorities. It also raises procedural questions: which statutory instruments would reassign climate-related analytics, and how will the OBR select and disclose alternative modelling assumptions? Reform UK’s timing—framing the changes ahead of a general election—signals an intent to make institutional reform a campaign plank, with implications for the Treasury’s future toolkit. Overall, the proposals trade broader policy engagement for a sharpened inflation focus, producing gains in clarity but potential costs in integrated risk management.