India's workforce at risk without rapid skilling amid AI-driven change
India needs to create about 8 million formal jobs each year through 2030 and vastly accelerate skilling to prevent automation and artificial intelligence from widening income gaps. At an AI summit in New Delhi, Chief Economic Adviser V. Anantha Nageswaran said the core risk is timing: technology adoption is moving faster than the systems that prepare workers for new tasks.
The policy challenge spans both demand- and supply-side fixes. On the supply side, India must expand modular, industry-aligned credentials, scale vocational pathways, and push continuous learning through public–private partnerships and EdTech platforms. On the demand side, employers should redesign roles to emphasize judgment, social skills and AI supervision rather than routine tasks, and offer high-fidelity on‑the‑job training such as paid apprenticeships and mentored cohorts.
Practical signs from other markets — including waves of AI-related layoffs and the concentration of AI infrastructure spending among a few large providers — underscore how quickly displacement can cluster in certain sectors and regions. That concentration can channel hiring and investment toward a narrow set of firms and technologies, raising the risk of localized shocks if policy does not steer open, portable standards and wider access to compute and data tools.
For India, sequencing matters: durable public investment in scalable skilling systems and certification should precede or run in lockstep with major automation rollouts to preserve the country’s demographic dividend. Financing should favor sustained, repeatable programs rather than one-off grants, and include incentives for firms to retain and retrain staff.
Operationally, ministries of finance and education, industry consortia, and EdTech providers must coordinate on common curricula, employer-recognized micro-credentials and interoperable digital records so training translates into real hiring signals. Local governments and industry clusters will also need targeted support where automation risks are highest to avoid abrupt labor-market dislocations.
Failure to act will likely produce uneven productivity gains — concentrated among better-skilled workers and firms tied to dominant technology stacks — while lower-skilled cohorts face stagnation or displacement. That would increase pressure on social protection systems and weigh on consumption growth over the medium term.
The operational prescriptions are pragmatic: expand apprenticeships and mentorship-based cohort learning, finance portable certification systems, promote open infrastructure and data standards to reduce lock-in, and use targeted wage or placement supports in acute disruption zones. These steps can make transitions smoother and keep more workers on stable career ladders.
India’s window to shape the distributional outcome is limited: without faster, coordinated skilling and infrastructure policy, technology-driven productivity could amplify inequality rather than broaden opportunity.
Read Our Expert Analysis
Create an account or login for free to unlock our expert analysis and key takeaways for this development.
By continuing, you agree to receive marketing communications and our weekly newsletter. You can opt-out at any time.
Recommended for you
Jersey weighs AI-driven 'synthetic workers' to lift output without swelling population
Jersey’s tech promotional body is urging firms to adopt AI agents to raise productivity and handle more financial services work without increasing resident numbers. Officials say the approach can work only with rapid reskilling, clear model governance, procurement standards to avoid vendor lock-in, and steps to manage ethical and copyright concerns.
When AI Shrinks the Base: What the Threat to Entry-Level Work Means for Firms
Generative and process automation technologies are compressing the pool of routine, entry-level tasks that historically absorbed early-career hires, forcing firms to rethink hiring, training and organizational design. The speed of capability growth — and concentration of AI infrastructure spending among a few providers — raises the risk of a rapid labour-market shock that will demand both firm-level reskilling strategies and coordinated public policy on infrastructure, competition and transition finance.
US Tech Job Market in 2026: AI-Driven Disruption and New Opportunity
AI is reshaping hiring: it is compressing many entry-level, repeatable roles while creating strong demand for practitioners who can apply, secure, and govern AI in production environments. The labor-market effects are being amplified and unevenly distributed by concentrated infrastructure spending, shifting data‑center finance patterns, and an intense political fight over national AI rules that will shape where compute — and thus many new jobs — locate.
