Software agents and connected devices are on the verge of acting as independent economic participants that buy bandwidth, sell telemetry, schedule services and procure spare parts without human intermediaries. Realizing that future requires payment infrastructure optimized for enormous volumes of tiny, frequent transfers — micropayments priced by the second, byte or inference — rather than sporadic large settlements. Distributed ledgers and crypto-based rails are a plausible technical route because they can enable near-instant settlement at unit costs low enough to support continuous billing models, but their success depends on far more than raw throughput. Practical deployments in 2025–26 — particularly decentralized physical infrastructure networks (DePINs) — have shown how onchain receipts can tie to real-world services and produce recurring, measurable revenue. At the same time, industry data indicate that a growing share of short-term transaction income is being captured at the application and service layer (stablecoin issuers, custody and liquidity providers), which shifts competitive advantage away from base layers toward front-end services. That redistribution makes service discovery primitives and cross-agent standards critical: they let disparate devices find, contract with and pay providers without bespoke integrations, making machine-to-machine commerce operationally feasible and auditable. But concentrating monetizable flows at the interface or custodian layer introduces fragility — composability assumptions can break if a few services become chokepoints, and regulators naturally focus on where revenue and custody are visible. Technical trade-offs remain central — throughput versus finality, on-chain cost versus off-chain aggregation, privacy versus auditability — and they interact with governance and legal clarity (token classification, custody rules and cross-border regulation) to determine viable architectures. For builders, a practical playbook is emerging: design token and governance models that map cleanly to real cash flows, integrate with low-cost settlement layers, and prioritize interoperability and vendor-neutral standards. Security, dispute-resolution and scalable governance are not afterthoughts: they must be engineered to handle autonomous counterparts that transact at machine timescales. If settlement rails become efficient, standardized and open, new business models — pay-per-inference AI, self-managing supply chains and real-time metered infrastructure — could flourish. Conversely, if economic surplus concentrates at custodial or interface layers, or if regulation fragments markets, the industry risks recreating centralized chokepoints despite decentralized settlement technologies. The shift is therefore a systems-level transformation that requires aligned incentives, operational-grade rails and common protocols as much as any single protocol breakthrough.
PREMIUM ANALYSIS
Read Our Expert Analysis
Create an account or login for free to unlock our expert analysis and key takeaways for this development.
By continuing, you agree to receive marketing communications and our weekly newsletter. You can opt-out at any time.