
Administration pushes tech firms to underwrite $15B in PJM power capacity
Read Our Expert Analysis
Create an account or login for free to unlock our expert analysis and key takeaways for this development.
By continuing, you agree to receive marketing communications and our weekly newsletter. You can opt-out at any time.
Recommended for you

Trump's Rate Payer Protection Pledge forces techs to fund data-center power
At the State of the Union President Trump unveiled a voluntary "Rate Payer Protection Pledge" asking hyperscalers to underwrite incremental electricity and grid upgrade costs tied to AI data centers. The White House paired federal land siting and a proposed ~$15 billion PJM-backed auction with public pressure, prompting mixed industry reactions, PJM pushback, and renewed debate over voluntary versus binding cost-allocation rules.

White House Presses Tech Firms to Absorb Data‑Center Grid Costs
The White House is pressing major cloud and AI companies for voluntary pledges to fund local grid upgrades tied to new data‑center builds to prevent utility rate increases for households. State and industry responses are fragmented — some states are moving toward binding rules and at least one hyperscaler has made a firm commitment, while regional grid proposals and operators push back — producing regulatory and investment uncertainty.

Anthropic to Underwrite Grid Upgrades for Its Data Centers to Limit Local Power‑Bill Pressure
Anthropic says it will finance utility-side upgrades and add generation capacity for its data‑center projects to avoid shifting those infrastructure costs onto local ratepayers. The company will also fund efficiency research, grid‑optimization tools and community engagement while joining a broader industry shift by hyperscalers to internalize upfront electrification costs.

Trump administration redirects $175M to shore up aging coal plants, drawing fierce environmental opposition
The federal government has redirected $175 million in resilience funding toward repairs and operational support for a handful of aging coal plants, while new White House directives also steer federal procurement toward coal-fired generation. Critics warn the combined funding and procurement signals will prop up uneconomic assets, raise local pollution and health risks, and invite legal and regulatory battles at state and federal levels.

AI data centers push U.S. electricity costs higher, Goldman projects
Goldman Sachs warns that rapid expansion of AI-focused data centers is a major contributor to recent and projected electricity demand growth, driving notable wholesale and retail power price increases through 2027 and easing in 2028. The pressure is uneven: concentrated buildouts have spurred local political pushback and roughly $64 billion of delayed projects, raising financing and underutilization risks that will shape who ultimately bears higher bills.

Big Tech Fuel Buildup Strains US Turbine Market
Hyperscalers' rush to on-site generation has created a sharp, concentrated demand for gas turbines and auxiliary units, stretching lead times, lifting prices and forcing utilities to rework procurement. That squeeze is being amplified by policy proposals (including a PJM-backed long-term auction), a politically sponsored large gas project in Ohio, and tighter interconnection rules in states like Texas — together reshaping short- and medium-term supply dynamics.

Trump directs Pentagon to lock in long-term coal power contracts
The president ordered the Defense Department to arrange extended electricity purchases from coal-fired power plants and asked the Energy Department to provide funds aimed at keeping specific facilities open. The move is designed to bolster the struggling coal sector and reroute military energy sourcing toward coal generation.
US Communities Push Back on Power-Hungry AI Hubs, Echoing Bitcoin Mining Conflicts
Communities in multiple US states are increasingly resisting large, power-intensive AI data center projects, raising questions about long-term grid strain and local costs. Industry tracking shows roughly $64 billion in US data center developments have been delayed or blocked, prompting tech firms to adopt new cost-sharing and community engagement tactics.